Link to NMFS Homepage Link to NOAA Homepage Keyboard Navigation Alaska Fisheries Science Center Home banner
Error processing SSI file


AUKE BAY LABORATORY (ABL) (cont.)

Habitat Investigations Program

Overwintering Herring Survey

  Acoustic echograms
Figure 1.  Acoustic echograms of herring concentrations near the Benjamin Island haulout showing sea lion diving behavior and herring behavior during fall and winter.

One hypothesis for the seasonal use of terrestrial haulouts by Steller sea lions to rest and care for their young is that prey are seasonally available in adjacent waters. Dense, overwintering aggregations of Pacific herring near Benjamin Island, a seasonal sea lion haulout in southeastern Alaska, are an example of this.

Peaks in sea lion attendance between October and December correspond with peaks in herring biomass near the haulout. Sea lion scat analyses indicate that herring are the most commonly consumed prey item between October and December, followed by walleye pollock.

Concurrently, herring, which undergo seasonal cycles in whole-body energy content, are most energy-rich in the fall and early winter. The combination of large biomass and high energy content of herring in the winter results in herring accounting for 96% of the prey-derived energy available near Benjamin Island.

Another aspect of foraging energetics is the effort associated with foraging. During the winter, herring aggregate in dense schools on the seafloor, which facilitates a reduction in pursuit by sea lions (Fig. 1). How easy it is for sea lions to find these aggregations influences the net benefits from foraging trips. Predictability of prey aggregations, both in time and location, decreases search time and improves foraging profitability.

Monthly prey surveys conducted between June 2001 and May 2004 indicate that overwintering herring aggregations occur consistently each year near Benjamin Island. Prey distribution in one month was a good indicator of prey distribution the same month the following year, but only during the winter months; this was due to the formation of large schools of herring in consistent locations within the study area.

During winter 2004–05, we are conducting prey surveys on weekly and daily intervals to examine predictability of herring schools on shorter time scales. Results from this fine-scale study will provide further insight into the energetic benefit sea lions derive from Pacific herring and the balance between predation avoidance by herring and the costs associated with searching by sea lions.

By J.J. Vollenweider and Ron Heintz

 

Groundfish Assessment Program

Energetic Importance of Various Fish Species As Prey for Steller Sea Lion in Southeast Alaska

Table 1.  Comparison of he relative importance of the Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) prey species as determined by frequency of occurrence (FO) and energy methods. Of the 41 prey species identified in sea lion scat, the top 5 species resulting from the energetics model are presented.

Prey Species FO Rank Energy Rank  

Pacific salmon
Pacific herring
Skates
Pacific cod
Mature walleye pollock

1
2
3
4
5

6
1
5
7
2

 

Prey values
Figure 2.  Relative values of prey consumed by Steller sea lions shown as frequency of occurrence (FO, top graph) and energy (kJ, bottom graph).
 

The relative importance of various fish species as prey for Steller sea lions in southeastern Alaska was estimated by applying energetic models to samples of sea lion scat. Relative importance of prey species contribution to the total energy consumed by sea lions was compared to results from frequency of occurrence analysis, a technique commonly used to examine pinniped diets.

Sea lion scats from the Benjamin Island haulout were collected simultaneously with collections of fish prey species in adjacent waters every 3 months during 2001–02. Biomass of prey was reconstructed from the bones in the scat and combined with prey energy content to calculate the seasonal energy in sea lion diet by prey species. The model was calculated using biomass-variable (BV) reconstruction, which assumes that scats represent random biomass of consumed prey.

Pooled over all seasons, the model indicated that Pacific salmon was the most important energy source for sea lions, followed by Pacific herring, skate, Pacific cod, and mature walleye pollock (Table 1). In contrast, frequency of occurrence analysis indicated that herring was the most important prey item, followed by three size classes of pollock (mature, juvenile, and young-of-year (YOY), and skates.

The most important prey species varied amongst seasons, however. For example, in October 2001, herring and pollock were consumed in the highest numbers; however, they were less important sources of energy than salmon, cod, and skates (Fig. 2). Our model of Steller sea lion energy consumption increases the utility of scat data beyond providing a numerical abundance of prey in sea lion diet to that which is most important to predators, the sources of dietary energy.

By J.J. Vollenweider, M. Sigler, D. Csepp, and J. Womble

Quarterly sidebar Contents

Feature

Items

ABL Reports

NMML Reports

RACE Reports

REFM Reports

Quarterly Index

Quarterly Home